The saved draft changed in another tab or could not be read.
Edits here will not overwrite it. New edits are kept in a separate local recovery copy when browser storage is available. Export this draft, or reload the saved version and use “Recover unsaved edits” in My brief.
COMPARISON WITHOUT FALSE EQUIVALENCE
Same question.
Different evidence.
Compare up to four cases by instrument, scope and implementation stage. Every missing step stays visible.
1 cases selectedChange selection +
Evidence comparison
Download comparison evidence ↓This is a selected documentary sample. Missing evidence does not establish non-payment, noncompliance, delay or absence of a policy.
| Dimension | Dengfeng hospital equipment lot 8 ↗ |
|---|---|
| Instrument | Public procurement |
| Period & scope | 2025 procurement · selected lot 登封采购-2025-184-2 |
| What is established | Nine quotation lines reconcile to the CNY 3.79m award. Three Mindray-branded lines account for CNY 3.324m. |
| Comparison basis | Selected lot award and quotation; product-brand labels are not legal entities. |
| Rules / call | ● Recorded |
| Original annex | ● Recorded |
| Award / allocation | ● Recorded |
| Contract | ○ Not established |
| Acceptance | ○ Not established |
| Reported execution | ○ Not established |
| Bank payment | ○ Not established |
| Unresolved | Acceptance and bank payment remain open. A published tender clause does not establish execution. |
| Next evidence | Signed contract, exact manufacturer identity, acceptance and payment records |
| Your brief |