The saved draft changed in another tab or could not be read.
Edits here will not overwrite it. New edits are kept in a separate local recovery copy when browser storage is available. Export this draft, or reload the saved version and use “Recover unsaved edits” in My brief.
COMPARISON WITHOUT FALSE EQUIVALENCE
Same question.
Different evidence.
Compare up to four cases by instrument, scope and implementation stage. Every missing step stays visible.
1 cases selectedChange selection +
Evidence comparison
Download comparison evidence ↓This is a selected documentary sample. Missing evidence does not establish non-payment, noncompliance, delay or absence of a policy.
| Dimension | Ningguo rural charging EPC ↗ |
|---|---|
| Instrument | Public procurement |
| Period & scope | Award 18 September 2026 · planned duration 360 days |
| What is established | An original award names a consortium for CNY 16,176,773.51. The tender specifies a 10% advance per started project excluding design. |
| Comparison basis | 10% per started project excluding design fees; denominator differs from Guangde. |
| Rules / call | ● Recorded |
| Original annex | ● Recorded |
| Award / allocation | ● Recorded |
| Contract | ○ Not established |
| Acceptance | ○ Not established |
| Reported execution | ○ Not established |
| Bank payment | ○ Not established |
| Unresolved | Award dated 18 September 2026; planned duration 360 days. No acceptance or payment established; absence at this early stage does not demonstrate delay. |
| Next evidence | Signed consortium contract, member shares, and later acceptance and payment records |
| Your brief |