The saved draft changed in another tab or could not be read.
Edits here will not overwrite it. New edits are kept in a separate local recovery copy when browser storage is available. Export this draft, or reload the saved version and use “Recover unsaved edits” in My brief.
COMPARISON WITHOUT FALSE EQUIVALENCE
Same question.
Different evidence.
Compare up to four cases by instrument, scope and implementation stage. Every missing step stays visible.
1 cases selectedChange selection +
Evidence comparison
Download comparison evidence ↓An unresolved source conflict is retained. Comparison does not adjudicate competing dates or quantity fields.
This is a selected documentary sample. Missing evidence does not establish non-payment, noncompliance, delay or absence of a policy.
| Dimension | Taicang vocational CNC lathes ↗ |
|---|---|
| Instrument | Public procurement |
| Period & scope | 2025 procurement · signing dates conflict |
| What is established | An award names an identified supplier for two CNC lathes. The contract cover and portal report different signing dates. |
| Comparison basis | CNY 1,090,000 award / contract consideration; not a grant or payment. |
| Rules / call | ● Recorded |
| Original annex | ● Recorded |
| Award / allocation | ● Recorded |
| Contract | ● Recorded |
| Acceptance | ○ Not established |
| Reported execution | ○ Not established |
| Bank payment | ○ Not established |
| Unresolved | Contract cover says 23 August 2025; portal says signed 5 September 2025. Date conflict retained. Acceptance and payment remain open. |
| Next evidence | Authority clarification of the date and quantity fields; acceptance and payment records |
| Your brief |