LATEST
外 Waitan Ludi Policy Terminal China industrial-policy monitor · updated 2026-10-25
Analyst view Opens on the Summary; every view lists its caveats and data. Data
Insights · evidence from 1,146 State Council directives and their provincial echoes

How Chinese policy travels, what it favours, and what it moves

One evidence base in six views. Every figure states its sample, its uncertainty and how it was measured. The data behind each chart can be downloaded.

The main findings across all views. Read the two-page briefing note →

151 days
median time for a province to restate a State Council directive; 59% of directives are restated within a year by at least one province
1,146
State Council directives, 2013–2026
5,644
directive–province pairs followed
6
provinces enumerated in full
40/40
hand-checked matches confirmed
Policy transmission

Provinces take up most State Council directives, and take about 5 months to do it

151 days
median time from a State Council directive to a province's implementing document (middle half 84–259 days)
59%
of directives (2013–2025) answered within a year by at least one of 6 fully listed provinces (653 of 1,112)
Why it mattersA State Council directive is usually restated by some province within months. Watching the provincial layer shows where and how fast central policy lands.
Data table
Directive cohortResponsesMedian days to respond
2013–15456170
2016–18648144
2019–21177166
2022–26100136
How we know

1,381 basis responses: a provincial-government document whose opening names the directive as its basis, in six provinces whose government documents are listed in full. Two independent coders confirm 99–100% of the responses this detects (reports/pap_responsiveness_results.md).

  • Whether provinces respond less often than they used to is not established: see the pre-registered test on the Data page.
Industrial strategy · Import substitution

The language of import substitution stepped up around 2020, from 1.9% of sector policy documents in 2017–19 to 6.4% in 2020–22, and has stayed there (6.1% in 2023–26)

2.8%
of policy documents call for 国产替代, 进口替代, 自主可控 or 卡脖子 fixes, 2013–16 (n = 251)
6.1%
in 2023–26 (n = 2,407)
×1.03
odds per year (95% CI 0.99–1.07), central and local documents, 3,834 documents
“构建福州、泉州、厦门联动发展格局,推动光电元器件在“卡脖子”领域的应用创新…”
Build a Fuzhou–Quanzhou–Xiamen development pattern, and push the application of optoelectronic components in "chokepoint" fields … (Fujian's 15th Five-Year Plan for emerging and future industries)闽政〔2026〕12号 福建省人民政府关于印发《福建省“十五五”新兴产业和未来产业发展规划》的通知 · 2026-07-30 · Future industries
“利用自主可控新型网络通信协议技术,构建即联即算、毫秒用算、安全可靠的城市算网融合网络。”渝府发〔2026〕20号 重庆市人民政府关于印发《重庆市“十五五”人工智能发展规划(2026—2030年)》的通知 · 2026-07-31 · AI and computing power
Share of sector policy documents using import-substitution language, by period of issue
2013–162.8%2017–191.9%2020–226.4%2023–266.1%

Whiskers: 95% Wilson interval.

Why it mattersSelf-reliance used to be a headline in a few national plans. Since about 2020 it has been an operating instruction in local implementing rules, with money attached: grants for 卡脖子 projects, "揭榜挂帅" challenge prizes, domestic-substitution targets. For a foreign supplier, the question is no longer whether China wants to replace its product, but which provincial programme is paying to do it.
Data table
PeriodPolicy documentsWith substitution languageShare95% CI
2013–1625172.8%1.4%–5.6%
2017–1948591.9%1.0%–3.5%
2020–22691446.4%4.8%–8.4%
2023–2624071476.1%5.2%–7.1%
How we know

Full text of every policy document (has a 文号 or an instrument title; news and Q&As excluded) in the 29 sector topics: 3,834 documents, 2013–2026. Substitution language: 国产替代, 国产化替代, 进口替代, 替代进口, 国产化率, 自主可控, 卡脖子, 受制于人. Not 安全可控, which usually means "safely and controllably". Logit of any mention on year and level (central vs local), robust standard errors.

  • Checked by hand: 39/40 randomly sampled matches are genuine calls for substitution or domestic control of a technology (95% CI 87%–100%); the miss used 卡脖子 for a rural power-grid bottleneck.
  • Each document is counted once, whichever sectors it belongs to.
  • Coverage is the corpus: deepest for Fujian, Guangdong, Beijing and Anhui, and the central libraries.
  • A mention is a stated aim, not evidence that substitution happened; the trade cards test that.
What comes next · The 15th Five-Year Plan

The first 15th Five-Year Plan documents name a new set of industries: low-altitude flight, future industries, data and robotics

12% → 23%
of plan documents name future industries
19% → 28%
of plan documents name low-altitude economy
6% → 14%
of plan documents name equipment renewal and trade-in
15th-plan documents (2025–26, n = 271) vs 14th-plan documents (2020–25, n = 501)
Named more oftenNamed less oftenNo clear change
-30-20-10-0+10+20Future industries+10 ppLow-altitude economy+8 ppEquipment renewal and trade-in+8 ppBiomanufacturing and the bioeconomy+4 ppRobotics and embodied AI-3 ppOvercapacity and anti-involution-5 ppSemiconductors and software-7 ppNew energy vehicles-8 ppPharmaceuticals and biopharma-8 ppFirst-of-kind major equipment (首台套)-8 ppMedical devices and equipment-8 ppForeign investment-8 ppSolar PV-9 ppCharging infrastructure-10 ppNew materials-11 ppUnified national market and fair com…-12 ppAI and computing power-15 ppChange in share of plan documents naming the sector, percentage points

Whiskers: 95% interval for the difference (Newcombe).

Why it mattersFive-year plan documents set what provinces and cities will fund for the next five years. The first 15th-plan documents mention the last decade's winners (electric vehicles, charging, solar) about as often as before, and add the "new quality productive forces" list on top: low-altitude aviation, future industries, the data economy, robotics and biomanufacturing. These are the sectors where the next round of local subsidies, guidance funds and procurement preferences will appear, and where today's trade flows are still small enough for exporters to be early.
Data table
Sector14th plan15th planChange (pp)95% CI
Future industries12% (61)23% (61)+10+5 to +16
Low-altitude economy19% (97)28% (75)+8+2 to +15
Equipment renewal and trade-in6% (32)14% (39)+8+4 to +13
Biomanufacturing and the bioeconomy3% (15)7% (18)+4+1 to +7
Specialised SMEs (专精特新)11% (56)14% (39)+3-2 to +8
Consumption and services demand6% (31)9% (25)+3-1 to +8
Data as a factor of production14% (72)16% (44)+2-3 to +8
Seed industry12% (61)12% (32)-0-5 to +5
Shipbuilding and marine equipment4% (20)2% (6)-2-4 to +1
Government procurement and domestic products10% (50)8% (22)-2-6 to +3
Civil aircraft and aero-engines5% (23)2% (6)-2-5 to +1
Industrial machine tools (工业母机)6% (31)4% (10)-2-6 to +1
Robotics and embodied AI20% (101)17% (47)-3-8 to +3
Critical minerals and export control8% (42)6% (15)-3-6 to +1
Hydrogen and fuel cells14% (68)10% (28)-3-8 to +2
New-type energy storage16% (79)12% (33)-4-8 to +2
Overcapacity and anti-involution7% (34)2% (5)-5-8 to -2
Drones and UAV technology17% (84)12% (32)-5-10 to +0
Semiconductors and software18% (91)11% (31)-7-12 to -1
New energy vehicles23% (115)16% (42)-8-13 to -2
Pharmaceuticals and biopharma26% (129)18% (48)-8-14 to -2
First-of-kind major equipment (首台套)18% (90)10% (27)-8-13 to -3
Medical devices and equipment18% (89)10% (26)-8-13 to -3
Foreign investment14% (71)6% (16)-8-12 to -4
Import-substitution language16% (82)7% (20)-9-13 to -4
Solar PV20% (99)10% (28)-9-14 to -4
Charging infrastructure22% (112)13% (34)-10-15 to -4
New materials28% (140)17% (47)-11-16 to -4
Unified national market and fair competition28% (138)16% (42)-12-18 to -6
AI and computing power57% (284)41% (112)-15-22 to -8
How we know

Documents with 十四五 or 十五五 in the title (the plans themselves), full text, each sector's own vocabulary. 15th-plan documents so far: 0 central, 0 provincial, 0 city or county. Difference in shares with a Newcombe interval.

  • The 15th-plan season has just begun: these are the first plans out, not the full set, and the mix of plan subjects (transport, education, digital) differs between the two rounds.
  • Naming a sector is not funding it; the topic trees will show the money as implementing rules follow.
From buyer to rival

China now exports more machine tools than it imports, and robots are at parity; in chip-making equipment, dependence is still growing

0.21 → 1.42
Machine tools: dollars exported per dollar imported, 2012 → 2025
0.16 → 0.97
Industrial robots: dollars exported per dollar imported, 2012 → 2025
0.53 → 0.84
Medical devices: dollars exported per dollar imported, 2012 → 2025
China's exports divided by its imports of the same products, 2012–2025
Machine toolsIndustrial robotsMedical devicesChip-making equipment
0.00.51.01.52012201420162018202020222024exports = importsMachine tools 1.4Industrial robots 1.0Medical devices 0.8Chip-making equipment 0.1

Above the line at 1, China exports more of the product than it imports.

Why it mattersThis is what substitution looks like when it works: the same customs code goes from import line to export line within a decade. For European and Swiss machine-tool and automation makers, the competition is no longer only for Chinese orders but for third markets. Chip-making equipment is the exception: despite a decade of support, China still buys about nine dollars of tools abroad for every dollar it sells.
Data table
Product group20122013201420152016201720182019202020212022202320242025
Pharmaceuticals0.210.200.180.180.170.150.170.140.240.820.210.160.180.24
Medical devices0.530.510.520.540.500.480.470.510.550.570.620.630.750.84
Machine tools0.210.280.290.340.370.370.390.560.610.640.881.181.261.42
Chip-making equipment0.150.140.140.120.140.110.080.080.080.090.120.120.110.11
Industrial robots0.160.190.150.180.180.160.230.240.230.220.300.360.890.97
Aircraft & engines0.110.110.130.180.220.200.170.220.260.230.310.330.300.21
Seeds for sowing0.790.660.630.520.490.350.300.330.340.280.310.340.420.33
How we know

UN Comtrade, China as reporter: exports (FOB) divided by imports (CIF) at the same HS codes, by year.

  • Unit values differ: China's exports are on average simpler machines than its imports, so a ratio above 1 does not mean technological parity.
  • Exports include foreign-invested plants in China.
Switzerland

Switzerland's exports to China are concentrated in sectors Beijing has marked for substitution

$17.0bn
Swiss goods exports to China excluding gold, 2025 (gold: 53% of the $36bn total)
44%
of it is pharmaceutical products
51%
falls in the exact product lines China targets for substitution
Composition of Swiss exports to China excluding gold, 2025, share by HS chapter
Pharmaceutical products44%Machinery13%Watches and clocks13%Optical, medical and precision instruments9.6%Electrical machinery6.8%Organic chemicals3.1%Plastics1.9%Essential oils and cosmetics1.8%
Why it mattersPharmaceuticals, medical and precision instruments and machinery are Switzerland's China business, and each is now a named substitution target. Three Chinese levers bear on them directly: volume-based procurement of medicines, the 2026 domestic-product price preference in public procurement (hospital equipment is public procurement), and first-of-kind support for domestic machine tools. The 2014 China–Switzerland FTA cuts tariffs; it does not cover these.
Data table
YearTotal $bnExcluding gold $bnGold shareTarget products share
20129.937.7222%26.2%
201320.998.6559%31.8%
201418.429.4249%36.5%
201520.138.956%39.0%
201627.179.6464%44.9%
201724.4911.0755%43.6%
201830.2611.961%40.6%
201921.5412.642%43.2%
202017.4414.6816%44.1%
202133.0715.5153%37.9%
202244.115.3765%42.1%
202345.1615.7865%41.8%
202441.8316.9460%48.8%
202535.9717.0353%51.1%
How we know

UN Comtrade, Switzerland as reporter, exports to China by HS chapter. Gold (HS 71) is excluded, as in the Swiss customs administration's business-cycle total, because refining flows swamp the rest.

  • Swiss export values (FOB) and Chinese import values (CIF) for the same flow differ; each card uses one reporter.
  • Chapter shares are coarse: chapter 84 includes much more than machine tools.
Government procurement

From 2026, "domestic" in Chinese public procurement means made in China, at a 20% price advantage

20%
price deduction for products meeting the domestic-product standard (from 1 January 2026)
80%
cost share at which a whole bid qualifies
5 years
to set product-by-product component thresholds

2021 · 财库〔2021〕35号

Equal treatment of domestic- and foreign-invested firms for products made in China. Bans discrimination by ownership, investor nationality or brand.

2025 · 国办发〔2025〕34号

A domestic-product standard: made in China (a change of character inside China's customs territory) plus a minimum share of component cost produced in China, set product by product with 3–5-year transitions. Qualifying products get a 20% price deduction in bid evaluation. Ownership-neutral: foreign-invested plants in China qualify.
Why it mattersThe preference has moved from who owns the firm to where the product is made. For a Swiss or EU exporter selling to Chinese public buyers from Europe, a 20% handicap applies. The incentive is to localise production. The notice defers to treaties that cover procurement; China is not yet a party to the WTO Government Procurement Agreement (Switzerland and the EU are). Medical devices are where this bites: hospital equipment is public procurement, and in June 2025 the EU used its International Procurement Instrument for the first time, limiting Chinese bidders in EU medical-device tenders above €5 million.
How we know

Both notices are in the corpus with full text; provisions quoted from the documents.

  • Product-specific thresholds are still to be issued; until then, made in China suffices.
Whose authority

Provincial documents have swapped State Council citations for Xi Jinping

50%
of provincial-government documents cited a State Council document number in their opening, 2016
9%
in 2026
3%
invoked Xi Jinping in 2013; 54% at the peak
What the opening paragraph of provincial-government documents invokes, by year
Cites a 国发/国办发 by numberInvokes Xi JinpingInvokes the Party Centre
0%20%40%60%2013201520172019202120232025Xi Jinping 40%Party Centre 19%State Council number 8.7%
Why it mattersLocal policy increasingly grounds itself in political authority rather than in a numbered State Council document. That makes it harder to trace through document numbers, and it may be part of why fewer responses are detected by citation in recent years.
Data table
YearDocumentsCites a State Council document (国发/国办发) by numberInvokes Xi JinpingInvokes the Party Centre (党中央/中共中央)
201327224.6%2.9%4.0%
201434529.0%1.5%5.5%
201543542.3%7.6%9.9%
201659949.6%24.2%12.7%
201773040.1%27.3%18.4%
201852335.8%49.7%22.4%
201925432.3%44.5%19.3%
202020524.4%44.9%24.9%
202124026.2%52.1%20.0%
202224824.6%46.8%28.6%
20231658.5%38.8%18.8%
202415910.7%54.1%19.5%
20251969.7%28.1%23.0%
20261508.7%40.0%18.7%
How we know

4,521 documents from the governments of six provinces; first 400 characters of the body. Trend from 2016, logit with province fixed effects: odds of citing a State Council number ×0.792 per year (95% CI 0.768–0.816); Xi ×1.075 per year.

  • Party-document numbers (中发/中办发) are almost never printed in openings: most are unpublished.
EU anti-subsidy case on battery-electric vehicles

Chinese settlement tables put numbers on central subsidies to the carmakers the EU sampled

¥16.9bn
BYD Group · EU duty 17.0%
¥4.1bn
Geely Group · EU duty 18.8%
¥2.3bn
SAIC Group · EU duty 35.3%
Central NEV purchase subsidies approved, ¥ billion (2015-and-earlier to 2017 cohorts)
BYD Group16.9Geely Group4.1SAIC Group2.3
Why it mattersThe EU investigation measured subsidies in its 2022–23 investigation period. These tables document the earlier, larger wave that built the groups' scale, from the Chinese government's own publications. That is the kind of evidence an FSR filing or a trade-defence submission can cite.
Data table
Group (EU duty)≤201520162017Total ¥bnVehicles (incl. 2018)
BYD Group (17.0%)2.019.655.2416.9335,171
Geely Group (18.8%)0.611.71.784.08119,686
SAIC Group (35.3%)0.021.171.132.32125,860
How we know

MIIT/MOF 新能源汽车推广应用补助资金清算 tables, parsed firm by firm; amounts are the panel's approved figures (应清算补助资金). Groups matched by name: BYD; Geely incl. 豪情/力帆乘用车/山西新能源; SAIC incl. SAIC-GM-Wuling and Maxus.

  • 2018 tables give vehicles only, no money, so 2018 is in the vehicle count but not the ¥ total.
  • Tesla Shanghai began deliveries after the last held settlement round.
Trade

China's electric-car exports grew more than 300-fold in eight years

$36.4bn
battery-electric car exports, 2025
331×
the 2017 value
$77bn
lithium-ion batteries, 2025
China's exports, US$ billion a year
Battery-electric cars (HS 870380)Lithium-ion batteries (HS 850760)
$0$20bn$40bn$60bn$80bn201720182019202020212022202320242025EU dutiesLithium-ion batteries $77bnBattery-electric cars $36bn
Why it mattersA decade of production-side support now shows up in trade. The provincial measures in this corpus are the documentary trail behind those capacities.
Data table
YearElectric cars $bnLi-ion batteries $bn
20170.117.98
20180.1310.83
20190.4413.03
20201.5815.94
20218.5928.32
202220.0950.92
202334.1365.01
202431.9761.13
202536.476.75
How we know

UN Comtrade, China as reporter, annual, summed over partners.

  • Values as reported by China. Monthly 2025 data are not yet in Comtrade; annual 2025 is.

Sources: Chinese government publications held in this corpus (State Council and ministry libraries, provincial government portals), UN Comtrade, the EU Publications Office, US-listed market prices. Built 2026-10-25. Statistics: Kaplan–Meier and Cox models (lifelines), logit and OLS (statsmodels). Findings are descriptive of published documents; they are not legal determinations.